Text below is text of part of a motion that should be filed at the onset of every criminal case.

Dishonest prosecutors and judges will oppose the motion.

No legitimate reason exists for judges and prosecutors withhold brady material.

.

.

1.   Defendant asks that all Brady material be given to defendant.

2.   Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 requires prosecution to provide all exculpatory evidence.

3.  Fifty years ago in Brady v. Maryland, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized the constitutional importance of providing a person accused of a crime with any and all favorable information that might affect the case. This decision established certain constitutional obligations for prosecutors during the pretrial information-sharing process known as “discovery.” Unlike discovery in civil cases, where the rules require that all parties get equal access to the same information, criminal discovery all too often is guided by prosecutors’ exceedingly narrow reading of the requirement established in Brady that the government disclose all favorable information to the defense. The failure to satisfy Brady obligations presents an obvious risk of conviction of the innocent and puts a significant financial burden on the accused.

4.  In the event that prosecution withholds Brady material the government shall pay to defendant 7 Billion dolllars.

5.   Defendant shall have the right to sue the  prosecutor the judge and any prosecution witnesses if Brady material was withheld.

6.   Prosecutor shall be sentenced to 37 years in prison for failure to disclose Brady material.

.

.

.